Anatomically Correct, My Foot!
I took one look at this illuminative side-by-side comparison done by NapNuts, and was totally taken aback.
Above: Tamiya 1/48 Sherman with (L-R) Artizan, Crusader, BTD, Tamiya 1/48 (picture courtesy of NapNuts Singapore Wargamers/Wargames)
Full Comparison: http://www.napnuts.com/gallery_tamiya48.htm
They’ve basically put 28mm figures from Artizan, Crusader and Black Tree Designs (the three “Big Names” in 28mm WW2 miniatures) next to a 1/48 figure from Tamiya… and the results are pretty shocking.
Standing next to an actual anatomically correct Tamiya model, the 28mm ones look so grotesque and disfigured!
To think that I actually thought that these 28mm models looked realistic… what was I smoking? (figuratively speaking – I don’t smoke)
All that time spent with Warhammer 40K miniatures must have really skewed my sense of aesthetics.
But then I hear that these beautiful Tamiya models aren’t really built for wargaming, and tend to be very fragile. More bad news is that 1/48 isn’t as popular a scale as 1/32 or even 1/72, so I’ll have trouble finding a good variety of models for wargaming.
Oh, well. Guess I won’t be using either 28mm or 1/48.
Back to deliberating between 15mm and 20mm…
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Just a thought on this point, 28mm originally began as 25mm ‘Heroic Scale’ and was used for fantasy miniatures. They have never been anatomically correct (mainley to make them more robust, as they get handled more than miniatures used for diaramas, etc) Also 28mm I believe is closer to 1/58 scale.
Regards,
Bob
Hey, good post! I will bookmark this one! Thanks